Percutaneous Revascularization Research Articles

Illusion of revascularization: does anyone achieve optimal revascularization during percutaneous coronary intervention?

This Perspective article is a form of 'pastiche', inspired by the 1993 review by Lincoff and Topol entitled 'Illusion of reperfusion', and explores how their concept continues to apply to percutaneous revascularization in patients with coronary artery disease and ischaemia. Just as Lincoff and Topol argued that reperfusion of acute myocardial infarction was facing unresolved obstacles that hampered clinical success in 1993, we propose that challenging issues are similarly jeopardizing the potential benefits of stent-based angioplasty today. By analysing the appropriateness and efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), we emphasize the limitations of relying solely on visual angiographic guidance, which frequently leads to inappropriate stenting and overtreatment in up to one-third of patients and the associated increased risk of periprocedural myocardial infarction. The lack of optimal revascularization observed in half of patients undergoing PCI confers risks such as suboptimal physiology after PCI, residual angina and long-term stent-related events, leaving an estimated 76% of patients with an 'illusion of revascularization'. These outcomes highlight the need to refine our diagnostic tools by integrating physiological assessments with targeted intracoronary imaging and emerging strategies, such as co-registration systems and angiography-based computational methods enhanced by artificial intelligence, to achieve optimal revascularization outcomes.

Drug Coated Balloon vs. Drug Eluting Stent in Multiculprit Primary Percutaneous Revascularization

Background: Patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) frequently face multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD). The optimal interventional approach remains debated. Objective: To systematically review and analyze the effectiveness and safety of drug-coated balloons (DCB) versus drug-eluting stents (DES) in multiculprit primary PCI through a randomized controlled trial. Methods: This prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial included 100 patients with STEMI and multivessel CAD at Lady Reading Hospital Peshawar from April 2023 to March 2024. Patients aged 18 years or older requiring revascularization of two or more culprit lesions were randomized into two groups: one received DCBs and the other DES. Exclusions were based on contraindications to dual antiplatelet therapy, allergies to study drugs, bleeding disorders, or life expectancy under one year. Results: Each group comprised 50 patients. The prevalence of hypertension (56% in DCB vs. 60% in DES, p=0.68) and diabetes (36% in DCB vs. 40% in DES, p=0.72) was similar. TVR rates were 10% for DCB and 8% for DES (p=0.45). MACE rates were 14% for DCB and 12% for DES (p=0.37). Conclusion: The study supports the use of DCB as an alternative to DES in specific clinical scenarios, emphasizing the need for tailored treatment decisions based on individual patient and lesion characteristics.

Outcomes of Percutaneous Revascularization in Severe Ischemic Left Ventricular Dysfunction.

This article presents a comprehensive review of coronary revascularization versus optimal medical therapy (OMT) in patients with severe ischemic left ventricular dysfunction. The REVIVED-BCIS2 trial randomized 700 patients with extensive coronary artery disease and left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35% and viability in more than four dysfunctional myocardial segments to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) plus OMT versus OMT alone. Over a median duration of 41months, there was no difference in the composite of all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalization, or improvement in LVEF with PCI plus OMT versus OMT alone at 6 and 12months, quality of life scores at 24months, or fatal ventricular arrhythmia. The STICH randomized trial was conducted between 2002 and 2007, involving patients with LV dysfunction and coronary artery disease. The patients were assigned to either CABG plus medical therapy or medical therapy alone. At the 5-year follow-up, the trial showed that CABG plus medical therapy reduced cardiovascular disease-related deaths and hospitalizations but no reduction in all-cause mortality. However, a 10-year follow-up showed a significant decrease in all-cause mortality with CABG. The currently available evidence showed no apparent benefit of PCI in severe ischemic cardiomyopathy as compared to OMT, but that CABG improves outcomes in this patient population. The paucity of data on the advantages of PCI in this patient population underscores the critical need for optimization of medical therapy for better survival and quality of life until further evidence from RCTs is available.

Application of the Academic Research Consortium High Bleeding Risk criteria in patients treated with coronary bioresorbable polymer everolimus-eluting stents: Insights from the POEM trial

BackgroundPrevious studies have investigated a 1 to 6-month short dual antiplatelet therapy (S-DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with modern drug eluting-stents to reduce bleeding events. ObjectivesTo investigate cardiovascular outcomes in patients at high bleeding risk (HBR) according to the Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) criteria after PCI with the Synergy bioresorbable-polymer everolimus-eluting stents (EES). MethodsWe applied ARC-HBR criteria in the population of the prospective, single-arm, multicenter POEM (Performance of Bioresorbable Polymer-Coated Everolimus-Eluting Synergy Stent in Patients at HBR Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization Followed by 1-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy) trial. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or definite or probable stent thrombosis at 12 months. ResultsThe original POEM cohort included 356 patients (80.4 %) fulfilling ARC-HBR criteria. Oral anticoagulant (OAC) usage and age ≥75 years were the most frequent major and minor ARC-HBR criteria, respectively. The ARC-HBR group was mainly represented by men (71.1 %), with 74.4 ± 9.3 years and a high burden of cardiovascular risk factors. DAPT was prescribed in 79.3 %, and single antiplatelet (SAPT) with OAC in 18.7 %. 12-month follow-up was completed in 96.2 %. The primary endpoint occurred in 5.2 % (95 % CI 3.29–8.10) of patients, whereas bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 3–5 occurred in 2.7 % (95 % CI, 1.39 %–5.05 %). ConclusionPrevious results of the POEM trial showed positive outcomes regarding ischemic and bleeding events with an S-DAPT regimen after Synergy EES. These results are also confirmed in sub-group analysis when ARC-HBR criteria are applied.

Incidence of left ventricular thrombus following STEMI in the modern era via multimodality imaging: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundLeft ventricular thrombus (LVT) is a significant complication in STEMI. Previous studies were conducted prior to modern timely percutaneous reperfusion networks. Current expert opinion suggests incidence in the current era has decreased. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to better understand the incidence and diagnosis of LVT in patients with STEMI treated with timely percutaneous techniques as assessed by multimodality imaging. MethodsCochrane, EMBASE, LILACS, and MEDLINE were searched over the last 10 years only including studies using contemporary techniques. The primary outcome was detection of LVT in patients via echocardiogram with or without contrast or Cardiac MRI (cMRI) following STEMI (both anterior and any territory) treated with PCI. Data was pooled across studies and statistical analysis was conducted via random effects model. Results31 studies were included. 18 studies included data on any territory STEMI, totaling 14,172 patients, and an incidence of 5.6% [95% CI 4.3–7.0]. 18 studies were included in analysis for anterior STEMI, totaling 7382 patients and incidence of 12.7% [95% CI 9.8–15.6]. Relative to cMRI as a gold standard, the sensitivity of non-contrast echocardiography to detect LVT was 58.2% [95% CI 46.6–69.2] with a specificity of 97.8% [95% CI 96.3–98.8]. ConclusionsIncidence of LVT in STEMI patients treated with contemporary timely percutaneous revascularization is in keeping with historical data and remains significant, suggesting this remains an ongoing issue for further investigation. Numerically, both cMRI and contrast echo detected more LVT compared to non-contrast echo in any-territory STEMI patients.

Safety, Efficacy and Outcome of Rotational Thrombectomy assisted Endovascular Revascularisation of the Superior Mesenteric Artery in Acute Thromboembolic Mesenteric Ischaemia.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of percutaneous rotational thrombectomy-assisted endovascular revascularization of acute thromboembolic superior mesenteric artery occlusions in acute mesenteric ischemia. Fifteen cases of percutaneous rotational thrombectomy- assisted (Rotarex S, BD, USA) revascularization were retrospectively analyzed. The etiology was embolic in 40 % of cases and thrombotic in 60 %. A "Thrombectomy in Visceral Ischemia" (TIVI) 5-point score determined vessel patency at presentation, after percutaneous rotational thrombectomy, and after adjunctive technologies. TIVI 3 indicated nearly complete revascularization (minimal residual side branch thrombus). TIVI 4 indicated complete revascularization. Technical success was defined as successful device application and a final TIVI score of 3/4 after adjunctive technologies. Safety and outcome were also analyzed. Device application via femoral access was feasible in 100 % of cases and improved flow in 86.7 % of cases (1 × TIVI 0→1, 11 × TIVI 0→2, 1 × TIVI 1→2). There was no change in 13.3 % of cases (2 × TIVI 2→2). Additional devices resulted in further flow improvement in 93.3 % of cases (8 × TIVI 3, 6 × TIVI 4). One recanalization failed (TIVI 2→2→2). After adjunctive technologies (10 × manual aspiration, 11 × angioplasty, 9 × stenting), the technical success rate was 93.3 %. The mean procedure time was 40.5(± 14) minutes for embolism and 72.1(± 20) minutes for thrombosis. There was one device-related major complication (catheter tip fracture) resulting in a device-related safety rate of 93.3 %. The overall major complication rate was 20 %. Surgical exploration (13 ×), bowel resection (9 ×) and Fogarty embolectomy/bypass (3 ×) were also performed. The 30-day mortality rate was 40 %. Percutaneous rotational thrombectomy is an effective adjunct for rapid endovascular recanalization of acute thromboembolic superior mesenteric artery occlusions with an acceptable rate of major procedural complications. · Percutaneous rotational thrombectomy-assisted superior mesenteric artery revascularization in acute occlusive mesenteric ischemia is feasible and effective.. · Percutaneous rotational thrombectomy facilitates rapid flow restoration in native and stented superior mesenteric artery segments.. · Brachial access should be considered in the case of steep take-off angles of the superior mesenteric artery..

The Role of N-Terminal-Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) and High-Sensitivity Troponin T (Hs-Troponin T) in the Evaluation of the Syntax Score in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Background N-terminal-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) is used to diagnose acute and chronic heart failure, but many studies show a strong and independent correlation between NT-proBNP serum levels and the severity and number of coronary artery damage. Meanwhile, the serum of high-sensitivity Troponin T (hs-Troponin T) has a very high prognostic value for the degree of coronary artery damage in patients with acute coronary syndrome. The SYNTAX score was developed to better predict the risks of percutaneous or surgical revascularization by considering the functional impact of the coronary circulation with all of its anatomic components, such as the presence of bifurcations, total occlusions, thrombus, calcification, and small vessels. Therefore, we conducted this study to understand the role of NT-proBNP and hs-troponin T in SYNTAX score evaluation in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Methodology A cross-sectional descriptive study of 86 patients diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome with indications for coronary angiography and intervention in the Department of Emergency and Interventional Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center, Hue Central Hospital, was conducted from June 2020 to May 2022. Results The mean age was 66.94 ± 10.61 years. The concentrations of NT-proBNP and hs-Troponin T in our study were 1115.9 ± 1623.3 pg/mL and 0.86 ± 1.55 ng/mL, respectively. The mean SYNTAX score in the study was 16.5 ± 7.5. There was a positive moderate correlation between the mean levels of NT-proBNP and the degree of coronary artery damage, as indicated by the SYNTAX score (P< 0.01, rho= +0.453). Conversely, there was a weak positive correlation between hs-Troponin T concentrations and the severity of coronary artery disease, based on the SYNTAX score (P < 0.01, rho = +0.387). The area under the curve (AUC) of the hs-Troponin T concentration value was 0.701, using a cutoff point of 0.109 ng/mL for hs-Troponin T concentration. This predicted the intermediate and high SYNTAX scores, with a sensitivity of 76% and a specificity of 59%. In comparison, the AUC of the NT-proBNP concentration value was 0.75, utilizing a cutoff point of 1120.5 pg/mL for NT-proBNP concentration. This predicted the intermediate and high SYNTAX scores, with a sensitivity of 60% and a specificity of 80.3%. Conclusions The levels of NT-proBNP had a positivemoderate correlation with the degree of coronary artery damage according to the SYNTAX score in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Hs-Troponin T levels of 0.109 ng/mL had higher sensitivity (76%) but lower specificity (59%) in predicting intermediate and high SYNTAX scores in patients with acute coronary syndromes than those of NT-proBNP levels of 1120.5 pg/mL, with a sensitivity of 60% and a specificity of 80.3%.

Mechanical Circulatory Support for High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

This review will focus on the indications of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and then analyze in detail all MCS devices available to the operator, evaluating their mechanisms of action, pros and cons, contraindications, and clinical data supporting their use. Over the last decade, the interventional cardiology arena has witnessed an increase in the complexity profile of the patients and lesions treated in the catheterization laboratory. Patients with significant comorbidity burden, left ventricular dysfunction, impaired hemodynamics, and/or complex coronary anatomy often cannot tolerate extensive percutaneous revascularization. Therefore, a variety of MCS devices have been developed and adopted for high-risk PCI. Despite the variety of MCS available to date, a detailed characterization of the patient requiring MCS is still lacking. A precise selection of patients who can benefit from MCS support during high-risk PCI and the choice of the most appropriate MCS device in each case are imperative to provide extensive revascularization and improve patient outcomes. Several new devices are being tested in early feasibility studies and randomized clinical trials and the experience gained in this context will allow us to provide precise answers to these questions in the coming years.

Exploring Electrospun Scaffold Innovations in Cardiovascular Therapy: A Review of Electrospinning in Cardiovascular Disease.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of mortality worldwide. In particular, patients who suffer from ischemic heart disease (IHD) that is not amenable to surgical or percutaneous revascularization techniques have limited treatment options. Furthermore, after revascularization is successfully implemented, there are a number of pathophysiological changes to the myocardium, including but not limited to ischemia-reperfusion injury, necrosis, altered inflammation, tissue remodeling, and dyskinetic wall motion. Electrospinning, a nanofiber scaffold fabrication technique, has recently emerged as an attractive option as a potential therapeutic platform for the treatment of cardiovascular disease. Electrospun scaffolds made of biocompatible materials have the ability to mimic the native extracellular matrix and are compatible with drug delivery. These inherent properties, combined with ease of customization and a low cost of production, have made electrospun scaffolds an active area of research for the treatment of cardiovascular disease. In this review, we aim to discuss the current state of electrospinning from the fundamentals of scaffold creation to the current role of electrospun materials as both bioengineered extracellular matrices and drug delivery vehicles in the treatment of CVD, with a special emphasis on the potential clinical applications in myocardial ischemia.

Castle Score Versus J-CTO Score for The Prediction of Technical Success in Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Revascularization

Background: Chronic total occlusions (CTOs) present a significant challenge in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Accurate preprocedural assessment and planning are crucial for the success of these interventions. The J-CTO score has been widely used to predict the success of PCI in CTO cases, but recent developments have introduced the EuroCTO (CASTLE) score, which may offer advantages in complex cases. Objective: This study aimed to compare the predictive accuracy of the EuroCTO (CASTLE) score with the J-CTO score in determining the success of PCI in CTO cases, with a focus on their utility in preprocedural planning and risk assessment. Methods: Conducted at a tertiary cardiac care center in Rawalpindi, Pakistan, this analytical cross-sectional study involved 120 patients undergoing PCI for CTO from January 2023 to November 2023. Inclusion criteria were patients aged 18-80 years requiring PCI for CTO, while patients with acute coronary syndromes, pregnant women, or those refusing consent were excluded. Data on clinical, angiographic, and procedural characteristics were systematically recorded. The EuroCTO (CASTLE) and J-CTO scores were calculated based on established algorithms. Technical success was defined as effective revascularization of the CTO lesion with less than 30% residual stenosis and TIMI grade 3 antegrade flow restoration. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS 25. Results: The mean age of the participants was 58.85 ± 11.1 years, with a male predominance (62.5%). Hypertension (67.5%) and hyperlipidemia (78.3%) were common comorbidities. The mean procedural time was 132.42 ± 5.11 minutes, and the mean fluoroscopy time was 41.19 ± 2.41 minutes. The J-CTO and EuroCTO (CASTLE) scores were 2.09 ± 0.70 and 1.91 ± 0.69, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed comparable predictive performance between the two scores, with slightly better discriminative ability in complex cases for the EuroCTO (CASTLE) score. Conclusion: Both the EuroCTO (CASTLE) and J-CTO scores effectively predict the success of PCI in CTO cases, with the EuroCTO (CASTLE) score showing potential advantages in more complex scenarios. These scoring systems are valuable tools for clinicians in preprocedural planning and risk assessment, enhancing the decision-making process in CTO interventions.

Traumatic Renal Artery Injuries: A Comprehensive Case Study Analysis

Post-traumatic renal artery injury is a rare yet critical complication following trauma, potentially leading to severe renal damage and functional loss. We present three cases of post-traumatic renal artery injury resulting in renal ischemia due to late diagnosis. Of particular note is that the interval between the first patient and the third is only three months, occurring at a time when such lesions are rarely observed. These cases, all involving young male individuals, highlight the challenges of prompt identification and timely intervention in such injuries. Delayed diagnosis hampered attempts at surgical revascularization in all cases, and our hospital lacked resources for percutaneous revascularization procedures. Despite efforts to manage these injuries conservatively, the success rates of surgical revascularization have been limited, leading to recurrent thrombosis. This has prompted the medical community to reconsider the approach to managing these injuries, with emphasis on non-operative methods and less invasive alternatives, particularly in the presence of a functioning contralateral kidney. However, determining the optimal management strategy remains elusive due to insufficient evidence regarding the efficacy of various approaches. Urgent management of renal artery injuries aims to preserve kidney function and mitigate secondary complications, such as renovascular hypertension. Long-term follow-up revealed varying outcomes among these patients, emphasizing the complex nature of managing post-traumatic renal artery injuries

Association between Ranolazine, Ischemic Preconditioning, and Cardioprotection in Patients Undergoing Scheduled Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Background and Objectives: Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) has demonstrated efficacy in protecting against myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury when applied before percutaneous coronary revascularization. Ranolazine, an anti-ischemic drug, has been utilized to minimize ischemic events in chronic angina patients. However, there is a lack of trials exploring the combined effects of ranolazine pretreatment and RIPC in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). Materials and Methods: The present study is a prospective study which enrolled 150 patients scheduled for nonemergent percutaneous coronary revascularization. Three groups were formed: a control group undergoing only PCIs, an RIPC group with RIPC applied to either upper limb before the PCI (preconditioning group), and a group with RIPC before the PCI along with prior ranolazine treatment for stable angina (ranolazine group). Statistical analyses, including ANOVAs and Kruskal-Wallis tests, were conducted, with the Bonferroni correction for type I errors. A repeated-measures ANOVA assessed the changes in serum enzyme levels (SGOT, LDH, CRP, CPK, CK-MB, troponin I) over the follow-up. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: The ranolazine group showed (A) significantly lower troponin I level increases compared to the control group for up to 24 h, (B) significantly lower CPK levels after 4, 10, and 24 h compared to the preconditioning group (p = 0.020, p = 0.020, and p = 0.019, respectively) and significantly lower CPK levels compared to the control group after 10 h (p = 0.050), and (C) significantly lower CK-MB levels after 10 h compared to the control group (p = 0.050). Conclusions: This study suggests that combining RIPC before scheduled coronary procedures with ranolazine pretreatment may be linked to reduced ischemia induction, as evidenced by lower myocardial enzyme levels.

Intravascular ultrasound use in peripheral arterial and deep venous interventions: Multidisciplinary expert opinion from SCAI/AVF/AVLS/SIR/SVM/SVS

Percutaneous revascularization is the primary strategy for treating lower extremity venous and arterial disease. Angiography is limited by its ability to accurately size vessels, precisely determine the degree of stenosis and length of lesions, characterize lesion morphology, or correctly diagnose postintervention complications. These limitations are overcome with use of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). IVUS has demonstrated the ability to improve outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention, and there is increasing evidence to support its benefits in the setting of peripheral vascular intervention. At this stage in its evolution, there remains a need to standardize the use and approach to peripheral vascular IVUS imaging. This manuscript represents considerations and consensus perspectives that emerged from a roundtable discussion including 15 physicians with expertise in interventional cardiology, interventional radiology, and vascular surgery, representing 6 cardiovascular specialty societies, held on February 3, 2023. The roundtable’s aims were to assess the current state of lower extremity revascularization, identify knowledge gaps and need for evidence, and determine how IVUS can improve care and outcomes for patients with peripheral arterial and deep venous pathology.

Impact of Target Lesion Revascularization on Long-Term Mortality After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Left Main Disease

BackgroundAlthough target lesion revascularization (TLR) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease is not rare, its timing of occurrence and prognostic impact on long-term mortality is uncertain. ObjectivesThis study sought to investigate TLR incidence over time and its impact on mortality after PCI with drug-eluting stents (DES) for LMCA disease. MethodsUsing a pooled data from 4 multicenter observational registries (IRIS-DES [Interventional Cardiology Research Incorporation Society-Drug-Eluting Stents], IRIS-MAIN [Interventional Cardiology Research Incorporation Society-Left MAIN Revascularization], MAIN-COMPARE [Revascularization for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Percutaneous Coronary Angioplasty Versus Surgical Revascularization], and PRECOMBAT [PREmier of Randomized COMparison of Bypass Surgery versus AngioplasTy Using Drug-Eluting Stent in Patients with Left Main Coronary Artery Disease]), we evaluated 1,397 patients with LMCA disease treated with DES and available long-term mortality data. The association between TLR and the 10-year risk of mortality was examined by multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression, with TLR as a time-varying covariate. ResultsDuring maximum follow-up of 10 years (median 6.8 years), TLR occurred in 118 patients and its 10-year cumulative incidence was 10.8%. TLR mostly occurred within 2 years after initial PCI and decreased over time: early-stage TLR (within 2 years) in 73 (61.9%) patients and late-stage TLR (beyond 2 years) in 45 (38.1%) patients. Among all TLR patients, 23 patients underwent coronary artery bypass grafting and 95 underwent repeat PCI. In the time-varying multivariable Cox model, the presence of TLR was not significantly associated with an increased risk of mortality (adjusted HR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.50-1.63; P = 0.73). ConclusionsAlthough the incidence of ischemia-driven TLR was mostly common within 2 years after left main PCI, TLR occurred steadily during the 10-year follow-up period. However, given that such patients were optimally revascularized, the prognostic impact of TLR on mortality was not substantial. (Evaluation of the First, Second, and New Drug-Eluting Stents in Routine Clinical Practice [IRIS-DES]; NCT01186133; Observational Study for Left Main Disease Treatment [IRIS-MAIN]; NCT01341327; Ten-Year Outcomes of Stents Versus Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease [MAIN COMPARE]; NCT02791412; Bypass Surgery Versus Angioplasty Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients With Left Main Coronary Artery Disease [PRECOMBAT]; NCT00422968)

Clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in chronic total occlusion in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Introduction and ObjectivesCoronary chronic total occlusions (CTOs) are relatively common findings in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, the indication for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and its clinical benefit in these patients remain controversial. MethodsA single-center retrospective cohort study with prospectively collected outcomes was carried out with CTO patients undergoing PCI in 2019 and 2020. Patients were divided into two groups according to previous T2DM diagnosis (T2DM and non-T2DM). The primary outcome was recurrence of angina and/or heart failure symptoms and secondary outcomes were myocardial infarction and all-cause mortality. ResultsA total of 177 patients (82.5% male) were included in the analysis, with a mean age of 65±11 years. The primary outcome (total symptom recurrence) occurred in 16.6% of the sample, with no difference between groups (non-T2DM 13.6% vs. T2DM 21.2%, p=0.194) in a two-year follow-up. Angina recurrence was significantly more frequent in T2DM patients (15.2%, p=0.043). The presence of T2DM was not an independent predictor of symptom recurrence (p=0.429, HR 1.37, 95% CI 0.62–2.98). Myocardial infarction and all-cause mortality were also not different between groups (T2DM 1.5%, p=0.786 and 4.5%, p=0.352, respectively, on survival analysis). Independent predictors of all-cause mortality were left ventricular function and creatine clearance (p=0.039, HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.85–0.99 and p=0.013, HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.93–0.99, respectively). ConclusionsT2DM did not influence outcomes in CTO patients undergoing PCI, and its presence should not be a limiting factor in deciding on CTO revascularization.

Heart Failure-Related Outcomes in Patients with Left Ventricular Dysfunction Undergoing Percutaneous Chronic Total Occlusion Revascularization

Heart Failure-Related Outcomes in Patients with Left Ventricular Dysfunction Undergoing Percutaneous Chronic Total Occlusion Revascularization

Coronary artery disease and transcatheter aortic valve implantation: diagnostic evaluation, management and indication for percutaneous revascularization

Coronary artery disease and transcatheter aortic valve implantation: diagnostic evaluation, management and indication for percutaneous revascularization

Do We Still Need Aspirin in Coronary Artery Disease?

Aspirin has for some time been used as a first-line treatment for acute coronary syndromes, including ST-elevation myocardial infarction, for secondary prevention of established coronary disease, and for primary prevention in patients at risk of coronary artery disease. Although aspirin has been in use for decades, the available evidence for its efficacy largely predates the introduction of other drugs, such as statins and P2Y12 inhibitors. Based on recent trials, the recommendation for aspirin use as primary prevention has been downgraded. In addition, P2Y12 inhibitors given as a single antiplatelet therapy have been associated with a lower incidence of bleeding than dual antiplatelet therapy in combination with aspirin in patients with stable and unstable coronary artery disease. The aim of this review is to discuss the role of aspirin considering the available evidence for primary prevention, secondary prevention for stable coronary artery disease or acute coronary syndromes, and after percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass revascularization.

Outcomes of Percutaneous Revascularisation in Post Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) Patients: A Tertiary Care Centre Experience

Outcomes of Percutaneous Revascularisation in Post Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) Patients: A Tertiary Care Centre Experience

Randomized Clinical Trial of Hybrid vs. Surgical vs. Percutaneous Multivessel Coronary Revascularization: 5‑year Follow-up of HREVS Trial

Randomized Clinical Trial of Hybrid vs. Surgical vs. Percutaneous Multivessel Coronary Revascularization: 5‑year Follow-up of HREVS Trial